A Simple Key For family law cases Unveiled

A Simple Key For family law cases Unveiled

Blog Article

Courts prioritize fairness and copyright fundamental rights when respecting the autonomy of educational institutions. On the aforesaid proposition, we are guided from the decision of your Supreme Court from the case of Khyber Medical University and others v. Aimal Khan and others, PLD 2022 Supreme Court 92. nine. The aforesaid exceptions are lacking in the present case. In such circumstances, this petition is found to generally be not maintainable which is dismissed accordingly with pending application (s). Read more

ninety three . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming to the main case, Additionally it is a very well-established proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is topic to the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-take pleasure in the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings over the evidence.

116 . Const. P. 469/2022 (D.B.) Zain Ahmed V/S The I.G of Police and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi In the moment case, the guidelines as established forth would not implement, as being the criminal Court hasn't convicted the petitioner, alternatively he has been acquitted of your criminal charges based on evidence and it is effectively-settled regulation that once the civil servant is acquitted during the criminal case, then on this extremely charge he cannot be awarded in almost any punishment by the department and held him disqualified for the post because acquittal for all potential purposes. The aforesaid proposition has become established at naught via the Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case on the District Police Officer Mainwali and a couple of others v.

12. There is no denial from the fact that in Government service it is expected that the persons possessing their character over board, free from any moral stigma, are to get inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is a condition precedent for appointment to the Government service. The candidates must have good character and supply two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed to some Government service may be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a way out or guise to perform away with the candidature in the petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 133 Order Date: 15-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

lengthy period petitioner was not thought of for promotion, meeting with the departmental promotion committee and take into account the petitioner (Promotion)

To the foregoing reasons the instant suit is dismissed with no order concerning cost. Office to prepare decree in the above terms. Read more

(Interview by email, with Ahmad Rafay Alam, a leading environmental lawyer and activist in Pakistan, August twenty eighth, 2015). Furthermore, the ruling placed a notice and comment restriction on government companies in regards to projects that could possibly pose a public risk. This case can be noteworthy, “because it laid down the foundations of all upcoming public interest litigation introduced before courts for environmental protection.” To cite just one example, following this case, the Supreme Court, citing the Zia decision, found inside the Salt Miners Case (decided on 12th July, 1994) that the right to have water free from pollution and contamination is often a right to life itself.

Upholding Justice: The application from the legislation and also the subsequent punishment on the guilty party give a sense of closure and justice to your victim’s family and loved types.

Accessing free case law sites in Pakistan is essential for legal professionals, students, and any individual seeking to understand Pakistani legal precedents.

All bankruptcy courts have a telephone information system, also known as being the Voice Case Information System, that permits callers to acquire primary case information through a touchtone phone. This is website free to employ and readily available 24 several hours daily.

کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟

The case of *R v. Ahmed* exemplifies the practical application of this amendment and its prospective to safe financial interests and maintain the integrity of your national currency. As legal practitioners and citizens, a comprehensive grasp of these changes is significant for upholding the principles of justice and contributing to a sturdy legal system.

Section 489-F of the Pakistan Penal Code pertains to offenses involving copyright currency notes and cash. Its primary objective should be to curb counterfeiting activities and maintain the sanctity of your national currency.

P.C. for grant of post arrest bail should even be dismissed. Suffice is to watch that that considerations for pre- arrest and post-arrest bail are fully different. Reliance in this regard is placed on case regulation titled as “Shah Nawaz v. The State” 2005 SCMR 1899” wherein it has been held with the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:--